State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Nikhil Ravindr Khapare — 159/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120002202026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
189/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
159/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
841
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nikhil Ravindr Khapare
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: In Case 159/2026, Nikhil Ravindra Khapare, a 32-year-old laborer, was charged under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense on 30/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. Considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of Rs. 200, with a default imprisonment of 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
22-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
28-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 159/2026
Case Summary: In Case 159/2026, Nikhil Ravindra Khapare, a 32-year-old laborer, was charged under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense on 30/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. Considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of Rs. 200, with a default imprisonment of 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts