State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Pawan Rajkumar Meshram Advocate - Adv. A. N. Narnaware — 9/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,34,504IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHNG120001252018

Evidence

Next Hearing

28th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

115/2018

Filing Date

05-02-2018

Registration No

9/2018

Registration Date

05-02-2018

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

FIR Details

FIR Number

398

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 324,323,34,504IPC

Petitioner(s)

State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Pawan Rajkumar Meshram Advocate - Adv. A. N. Narnaware

Ashwin Mahadeo Meshram

Adv. Adv. S. T. Kshirsagar

Rupesh Deoraoji Bodhad

Adv. Adv. S. T. Kshirsagar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

28-04-2026

Evidence

04-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

10-02-2026

Evidence

19-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

19-08-2025
Evidence

This document is a witness examination record from a criminal case in Maharashtra, India. The witness (Vijay Dinkar Patil) testified regarding police panchnama (official records) prepared on 22/12/2017 and 24/12/2017, and confirmed seizure of wooden sticks from accused persons. The cross-examination was permitted, and the witness's testimony was recorded as complete. The appeal/objection by the accused's advocate was rejected (appeal rejected, no stay granted). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness examination record from a criminal case in Maharashtra, India. The witness (Vijay Dinkar Patil) testified regarding police panchnama (official records) prepared on 22/12/2017 and 24/12/2017, and confirmed seizure of wooden sticks from accused persons. The cross-examination was permitted, and the witness's testimony was recorded as complete. The appeal/objection by the accused's advocate was rejected (appeal rejected, no stay granted). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case