State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Preetam Baldevsingh Bamnavat — 95/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120001212026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2026
Filing Number
117/2026
Filing Date
17-01-2026
Registration No
95/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
780
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
Preetam Baldevsingh Bamnavat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 95/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Pritam Baldevsing Bamnavat under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to gambling charges. Considering his poverty, lack of criminal history, and the minor nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment until rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (with 3 days imprisonment in default). Seized cash of Rs. 410 was forfeited to the State Government, and gambling paraphernalia was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 95/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Pritam Baldevsing Bamnavat under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to gambling charges. Considering his poverty, lack of criminal history, and the minor nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment until rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (with 3 days imprisonment in default). Seized cash of Rs. 410 was forfeited to the State Government, and gambling paraphernalia was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts