State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Dinesh Rakhyaji Bawne — 93/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120001192026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2026
Filing Number
115/2026
Filing Date
17-01-2026
Registration No
93/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
783
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
Dinesh Rakhyaji Bawne
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 93/2026 Dinesh Rakhyaji Bawane, a 36-year-old laborer, was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 after pleading guilty to gambling charges. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until rising of court and imposed a fine of Rs. 200 (with 3 days default imprisonment). Considering his poverty, lack of criminal history, and voluntary guilty plea, the magistrate took a lenient view. Seized cash of Rs. 810 was forfeited to the state, a mobile phone returned to its owner, and gambling materials destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 93/2026 Dinesh Rakhyaji Bawane, a 36-year-old laborer, was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 after pleading guilty to gambling charges. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until rising of court and imposed a fine of Rs. 200 (with 3 days default imprisonment). Considering his poverty, lack of criminal history, and voluntary guilty plea, the magistrate took a lenient view. Seized cash of Rs. 810 was forfeited to the state, a mobile phone returned to its owner, and gambling materials destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts