State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Preetam Baldevsingh Bamnavat — 80/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120001082026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2026
Filing Number
104/2026
Filing Date
17-01-2026
Registration No
80/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
661
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
Preetam Baldevsingh Bamnavat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 14-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 17-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 80/2026 Pritam Baldevsingh Bamnavat was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 after pleading guilty to gambling charges. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (or 3 days additional imprisonment in default), considering his poor financial condition and lack of prior criminal record. Seized property including Rs. 310 was forfeited to the State Government, while gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 80/2026 Pritam Baldevsingh Bamnavat was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 after pleading guilty to gambling charges. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (or 3 days additional imprisonment in default), considering his poor financial condition and lack of prior criminal record. Seized property including Rs. 310 was forfeited to the State Government, while gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts