State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Suneel Govindrao Niburkar — 51/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120000762026
e-Filing Number
08-01-2026
Filing Number
72/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
51/2026
Registration Date
12-01-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
638
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
Suneel Govindrao Niburkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 51/2026 Sunil Govindrao Nimburkar was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense committed on 10/12/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after being informed of the consequences of his plea in Marathi. The court accepted his guilty plea, considering his financial hardship, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offense. Decision: The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 200, or alternatively, suffer simple imprisonment for 3 days in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 51/2026 Sunil Govindrao Nimburkar was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense committed on 10/12/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after being informed of the consequences of his plea in Marathi. The court accepted his guilty plea, considering his financial hardship, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offense. Decision: The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 200, or alternatively, suffer simple imprisonment for 3 days in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts