Mandabai wd/o Nilkanth Thakare vs Savita wd/o Ravindra Thakare — 80/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG110008092022
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
101/2022
Filing Date
05-09-2022
Registration No
80/2022
Registration Date
05-09-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi
Judge
1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mandabai wd/o Nilkanth Thakare
Adv. S.H. TALMALE
Sachin s/o Nilkanth Thakare
Adv. S.H. TALMALE
Jitendra Nilkanth Thakare
Nitin Nilkanth Thakare
Respondent(s)
Savita wd/o Ravindra Thakare
Vidyaprakash Gangaprasad Pande
Rajkumar Gagaprasad Pande
Pranay Kashinath Bandbuche
Prafulla Kashinath Bandbhuche
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 18-12-2025 | Hearing |
| 30-10-2025 | Hearing |
| 18-09-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Mandabai v. Savita (R.C.S. No. 80/2022) Outcome: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected. The court found the plaintiff's suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding disputed agricultural property to be tenable, with proper court fees paid and necessary parties joined. Key Orders: The defendant is ordered to pay costs of Rs. 2,000 to the plaintiff within one month, and must file a separate application if seeking to set aside any status quo order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mandabai v. Savita (R.C.S. No. 80/2022) Outcome: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected. The court found the plaintiff's suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding disputed agricultural property to be tenable, with proper court fees paid and necessary parties joined. Key Orders: The defendant is ordered to pay costs of Rs. 2,000 to the plaintiff within one month, and must file a separate application if seeking to set aside any status quo order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts