State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Veltur vs Harshal Moreshwar Thamke — 301/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110003962026

Filing Number

371/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

301/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

Veltur

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Veltur

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Harshal Moreshwar Thamke

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Harshal Moreshwar Thamke (301/2026) The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi convicted Harshal Moreshwar Thamke (age 26) of an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle in an obstructive manner on a public way on 05/03/2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in vernacular. Considering the nature of the offense, the accused's weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the magistrate sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with a default provision of simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 301/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Harshal Moreshwar Thamke (301/2026) The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi convicted Harshal Moreshwar Thamke (age 26) of an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle in an obstructive manner on a public way on 05/03/2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in vernacular. Considering the nature of the offense, the accused's weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the magistrate sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with a default provision of simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case