State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi vs Mohan Ankush Bhivgade — 294/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110003712026

Filing Number

347/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

294/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

124

Police Station

Kuhi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohan Ankush Bhivgade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Kuhi convicted accused Mohan Ankush Bhivgade of parking a vehicle (Auto-rickshaw bearing registration No. MH.40-1694) obstructing public navigation on 08/02/2026, an offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court accepted the accused's voluntary guilty plea and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with default imprisonment of 3 days, considering the minor nature of the offence and his weak economic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 294/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Kuhi convicted accused Mohan Ankush Bhivgade of parking a vehicle (Auto-rickshaw bearing registration No. MH.40-1694) obstructing public navigation on 08/02/2026, an offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court accepted the accused's voluntary guilty plea and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with default imprisonment of 3 days, considering the minor nature of the offence and his weak economic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case