State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi vs Pravin Chandrabhan Lute — 293/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110003702026

Filing Number

346/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

293/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

158

Police Station

Kuhi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pravin Chandrabhan Lute

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary - SCC 293/2026 Pravin Chandrabhan Lute was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle (Max, registration MH-40-KR-0292) in a manner obstructing public passage on 09.02.2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the court accepted his plea. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the statutory punishment available, the accused's weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with a default provision of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 293/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - SCC 293/2026 Pravin Chandrabhan Lute was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle (Max, registration MH-40-KR-0292) in a manner obstructing public passage on 09.02.2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the court accepted his plea. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the statutory punishment available, the accused's weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with a default provision of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case