State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi vs Amol Kisan Dahare — 292/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110003682026

Filing Number

345/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

292/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Kuhi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amol Kisan Dahare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 292/2026: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi convicted Amol Kisan Dahare of obstructing a public way by parking his vehicle (MH-4D6F-6227) in a manner that obstructed navigation, under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in vernacular. Considering the nature of the offence, the accused's weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the magistrate imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine, with default imprisonment of 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 292/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 292/2026: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi convicted Amol Kisan Dahare of obstructing a public way by parking his vehicle (MH-4D6F-6227) in a manner that obstructed navigation, under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in vernacular. Considering the nature of the offence, the accused's weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the magistrate imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine, with default imprisonment of 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case