State of Maharashtra P.S.O Veltur vs Amar Shankar Fulzale — 262/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG110003432026
Filing Number
320/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
262/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi
Judge
1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
Veltur
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra P.S.O Veltur
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Amar Shankar Fulzale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi
Disposed
First Order
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | First Order |
| 14-03-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: SCC 262/2026 Amar Shankar Fulzale was charged with obstructing a public way by parking his vehicle (Max, Registration No. MH-25-R-9326) in a manner that obstructed public navigation on 03.02.2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges. The Judicial Magistrate convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, with a default sentence of 3 days simple imprisonment, considering the minor nature of the offense and the accused's weak economic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SCC 262/2026 Amar Shankar Fulzale was charged with obstructing a public way by parking his vehicle (Max, Registration No. MH-25-R-9326) in a manner that obstructed public navigation on 03.02.2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges. The Judicial Magistrate convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, with a default sentence of 3 days simple imprisonment, considering the minor nature of the offense and the accused's weak economic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts