State of Maharashtra P.S.O Kuhi vs Ritik Ranbhid Wanjari — 236/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110003112026

Filing Number

289/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

236/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

101

Police Station

Kuhi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O Kuhi

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ritik Ranbhid Wanjari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 236/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi, convicted accused Ritik Ranbhid Wanjari under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking a vehicle in an obstructive manner on a public way on 05/02/2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with a default provision of 3 days simple imprisonment, with the court considering his weak economic condition and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 236/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 236/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi, convicted accused Ritik Ranbhid Wanjari under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking a vehicle in an obstructive manner on a public way on 05/02/2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with a default provision of 3 days simple imprisonment, with the court considering his weak economic condition and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case