State of Maharashtra P.S.O.veltur vs Aniket Changdev Barai — 220/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110002952026

Filing Number

273/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

220/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

Veltur

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O.veltur

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aniket Changdev Barai

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary - 220/2026 Aniket Changdev Barai was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle (Omni, Reg. No. MH-31-AW-9231) obstructively on a public way on 02.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained in vernacular. Considering the minor nature of the offense, weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 220/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - 220/2026 Aniket Changdev Barai was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle (Omni, Reg. No. MH-31-AW-9231) obstructively on a public way on 02.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained in vernacular. Considering the minor nature of the offense, weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case