State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi vs Kailas Shesingh Markam — 212/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110002862026

Filing Number

264/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

212/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

Kuhi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kailas Shesingh Markam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: SCC 212/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Kailas Shesingh Markam under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle (MH-46, U294) obstructively on a public way on 22.01.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in vernacular. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with a default provision of 3 days simple imprisonment. The magistrate considered the minor nature of the offence, weak economic condition of the accused, and his family responsibilities in imposing the lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 212/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC 212/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Kailas Shesingh Markam under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle (MH-46, U294) obstructively on a public way on 22.01.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in vernacular. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with a default provision of 3 days simple imprisonment. The magistrate considered the minor nature of the offence, weak economic condition of the accused, and his family responsibilities in imposing the lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case