State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi vs Dilip Mahadeoji Makde — 205/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG110002782026
Filing Number
257/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
205/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi
Judge
1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
150
Police Station
Kuhi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Dilip Mahadeoji Makde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: SCC 205/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi, convicted accused Dilip Mahadeoji Makde under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for illegally parking his vehicle (MH.40-103) in a manner obstructing public passage on 09.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in vernacular. Considering the nature of the offense, applicable punishment, the accused's weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with three days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SCC 205/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi, convicted accused Dilip Mahadeoji Makde under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for illegally parking his vehicle (MH.40-103) in a manner obstructing public passage on 09.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in vernacular. Considering the nature of the offense, applicable punishment, the accused's weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with three days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts