State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi vs Dilip Mahadeoji Makde — 205/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110002782026

Filing Number

257/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

205/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

150

Police Station

Kuhi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Kuhi

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dilip Mahadeoji Makde

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: SCC 205/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi, convicted accused Dilip Mahadeoji Makde under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for illegally parking his vehicle (MH.40-103) in a manner obstructing public passage on 09.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in vernacular. Considering the nature of the offense, applicable punishment, the accused's weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with three days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 205/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC 205/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi, convicted accused Dilip Mahadeoji Makde under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for illegally parking his vehicle (MH.40-103) in a manner obstructing public passage on 09.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in vernacular. Considering the nature of the offense, applicable punishment, the accused's weak economic condition, and family responsibilities, the court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with three days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case