State of Maharashtra P.S.O Kuhi vs Kailas Shersingh Markam — 189/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110002612026

Filing Number

240/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

189/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

131

Police Station

Kuhi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O Kuhi

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kailas Shersingh Markam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 189/2026 Summary: The accused Kailas Shersingh Markam voluntarily pleaded guilty to obstructing a public way by parking his vehicle improperly on 08/02/2026, in violation of Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The Judicial Magistrate accepted the plea and convicted him, imposing a fine of Rs. 500 with three days' simple imprisonment in default, considering the nature of the offense and the accused's weak economic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 189/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 189/2026 Summary: The accused Kailas Shersingh Markam voluntarily pleaded guilty to obstructing a public way by parking his vehicle improperly on 08/02/2026, in violation of Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The Judicial Magistrate accepted the plea and convicted him, imposing a fine of Rs. 500 with three days' simple imprisonment in default, considering the nature of the offense and the accused's weak economic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case