State of Maharashtra P.S.O Kuhi vs Niketan Ramesh Moon — 187/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110002572026

Filing Number

236/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

187/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

114

Police Station

Kuhi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O Kuhi

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Niketan Ramesh Moon

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 187/2026 Summary: Niketan Ramesh Moon was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle (registration MH.-49-CN-1786) in an obstructive manner on a public way on 06.02.2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with three days simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering the minor nature of the offense and the accused's weak economic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 187/2026 Summary: Niketan Ramesh Moon was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle (registration MH.-49-CN-1786) in an obstructive manner on a public way on 06.02.2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kuhi. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with three days simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering the minor nature of the offense and the accused's weak economic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case