Sunil Ramchandra Gadhave vs Ganesh Ramchandra Gadhave Advocate - S.P. PRASAD1. — 1200048/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG110002452011
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
1200048/2011
Filing Date
02-11-2011
Registration No
1200048/2011
Registration Date
02-11-2011
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi
Judge
1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Ramchandra Gadhave
Adv. S.S.NAKADE
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Ramchandra Gadhave Advocate - S.P. PRASAD1.
Jaswandabai @ Radhabai Ganesh Gadhave 1.
Jageshwar Ganesh Gadhave 1.
Nitin Ganesh Gadhave
Devendra Ramchandra Gadhave
Adv. S.P. PRASAD
Bajubai Ramchandra Gadhave
Shobhabai Someshwar Hinge
Bebibai Dasharth Ganbhade
Aditya Devchand Gadhave
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 18-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 10-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Order This is a civil succession case (Case No. 48/2011) from a District Court in Nagpur, Maharashtra. The court recorded testimonies of multiple witnesses regarding a disputed will and agricultural land inheritance dated July 9, 2001. The court's final conclusion was that the petition was dismissed with no relief granted — the disputed will and claims for land division among the named defendants (Defendants 1-5) were rejected based on insufficient evidence and contradictions in witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Order This is a civil succession case (Case No. 48/2011) from a District Court in Nagpur, Maharashtra. The court recorded testimonies of multiple witnesses regarding a disputed will and agricultural land inheritance dated July 9, 2001. The court's final conclusion was that the petition was dismissed with no relief granted — the disputed will and claims for land division among the named defendants (Defendants 1-5) were rejected based on insufficient evidence and contradictions in witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts