State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Veltur vs Dilip Abhiman Meshram — 168/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG110002352026

Filing Number

216/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

168/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.O. Veltur

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dilip Abhiman Meshram

  2. 2.Amardeep Bhiwaji Meshram

  3. 3.Upas Bhaiyyaji Sahare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 168/2026 The court convicted all three accused—Dilip Abhiman Meshram, Amardeep Bhiwaji Meshram, and Upas Bhaiyyaji Sahare—under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12-A for operating an illegal 52-card gambling game in a public place on 11.02.2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of ₹300, with one day's simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 168/2026 The court convicted all three accused—Dilip Abhiman Meshram, Amardeep Bhiwaji Meshram, and Upas Bhaiyyaji Sahare—under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12-A for operating an illegal 52-card gambling game in a public place on 11.02.2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of ₹300, with one day's simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case