Natthu Sitaram Mundle vs Kashiram Wadgu Mundle Advocate - K.G.LOKHANDE — 13/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG110001852021
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
24/2021
Filing Date
04-03-2021
Registration No
13/2021
Registration Date
04-03-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi
Judge
1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Natthu Sitaram Mundle
Adv. D. A. Golhar
Haribhau Sitaram Mundle
Adv. D. A. Golhar
Sayatra Sitaram Mundle
Indira Barsu Karambhe
Adv. D. A. Golhar
Respondent(s)
Kashiram Wadgu Mundle Advocate - K.G.LOKHANDE
Diwalu Kashiram Mundle
Adv. K.G.LOKHANDE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi
Issues
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Issues |
| 16-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 09-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 08-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 13/2021 Outcome: The petition for a mandatory injunction (माई हुकूम) filed by petitioners Natthu Sitaram Mundle and others against respondents Kashiram Wadgu Mundle and Diwalu Kashiram Mundle was GRANTED. The court ordered immediate issuance of the mandatory injunction in Petition No. 05, with no order on costs. Key Issue: The dispute concerned ownership and possession of a jointly-purchased property (House No. 123 in Chapegarhi village). The petitioners claimed the entire property belonged to their father Sitaram, while respondents claimed 750 sq. ft. of the 1500 sq. ft. property. The court found that since both parties jointly purchased the property, they held joint undivided rights, and petitioners proved their case for relief under Civil Procedure Code Rules 39(1)-(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 13/2021 Outcome: The petition for a mandatory injunction (माई हुकूम) filed by petitioners Natthu Sitaram Mundle and others against respondents Kashiram Wadgu Mundle and Diwalu Kashiram Mundle was GRANTED. The court ordered immediate issuance of the mandatory injunction in Petition No. 05, with no order on costs. Key Issue: The dispute concerned ownership and possession of a jointly-purchased property (House No. 123 in Chapegarhi village). The petitioners claimed the entire property belonged to their father Sitaram, while respondents claimed 750 sq. ft. of the 1500 sq. ft. property. The court found that since both parties jointly purchased the property, they held joint undivided rights, and petitioners proved their case for relief under Civil Procedure Code Rules 39(1)-(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts