Pradip Madhukar Bawankule vs Vinayak Mahadeo Bawankule Advocate - R.D. KINDARLEY — 12/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 39 , 151. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG110001782026

Issues

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

17/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section order 39 , 151

Petitioner(s)

Pradip Madhukar Bawankule

Adv. TALMALE SANDEEP HARIBHAU

Respondent(s)

Vinayak Mahadeo Bawankule Advocate - R.D. KINDARLEY

Ashish Vinayak Bawankule

Ankit Vinayak Bawankule

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Kuhi

11-03-2026

Issues

10-03-2026

Order

24-02-2026

W.S. and Say

23-02-2026

Order on Exh

20-02-2026

Awaiting Notice

Interim Orders

20-02-2026
Order on T.I.
11-03-2026
Order on T.I.

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from construction on disputed property. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership or exclusive possession over the disputed 744 sq.ft. space, as he relied only on Gram Panchayat records rather than documentary proof of title. Since the property is ancestral and an partition dispute is pending before the District Judge, all legal heirs hold joint ownership, and injunctions cannot be granted against co-sharers. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from construction on disputed property. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership or exclusive possession over the disputed 744 sq.ft. space, as he relied only on Gram Panchayat records rather than documentary proof of title. Since the property is ancestral and an partition dispute is pending before the District Judge, all legal heirs hold joint ownership, and injunctions cannot be granted against co-sharers. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Kuhi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case