Badal Laxman Dadamal vs Nil — 55/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

M.J.Cases - M.J.C

CNR: MHNG100024152025

e-Filing Number

04-12-2025

Filing Number

504/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

55/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Badal Laxman Dadamal

    Adv. KHATIK PRAKASH MAROTI

  2. 2.Himani Laxman Dadamal

    Adv. KHATIK PRAKASH MAROTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the application and granted heirship certificates to applicants Badal and Himani under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, establishing them as the surviving legal heirs of deceased Laxman Kawduji Dadmal and Veena Laxmanrao Dadmal. The court's decision was based on uncontested evidence including death certificates, Aadhar cards, and newspaper publications, with no objections filed against the applicants' claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application and granted heirship certificates to applicants Badal and Himani under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, establishing them as the surviving legal heirs of deceased Laxman Kawduji Dadmal and Veena Laxmanrao Dadmal. The court's decision was based on uncontested evidence including death certificates, Aadhar cards, and newspaper publications, with no objections filed against the applicants' claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case