Ananta Vinayakrao Purohit vs Arvind Vinayakrao Purohit — 152/2025
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG100022712025
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
24-11-2025
Filing Number
491/2025
Filing Date
25-11-2025
Registration No
152/2025
Registration Date
25-11-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ananta Vinayakrao Purohit
Adv. MADDALWAR RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA
Hemanta Vinayakrao Purohit
Adv. MADDALWAR RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA
Sunita W/o Sanjay Pande
Adv. MADDALWAR RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA
Sunanda W/o Shrikant Shriram
Adv. MADDALWAR RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA
Utkarsha Uday Vekhande
Adv. MADDALWAR RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA
Respondent(s)
Arvind Vinayakrao Purohit
Kshitij Vikas Khanorkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 09-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 06-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 12-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 05-02-2026 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by the applicant against Defendant No. 2 seeking permission to file a written statement was dismissed as infructuous. The court found that the case had already been decided, Defendant No. 2's objection under Rule 7 was upheld, and the applicant's petition had become pointless. Order passed on 09 April 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by the applicant against Defendant No. 2 seeking permission to file a written statement was dismissed as infructuous. The court found that the case had already been decided, Defendant No. 2's objection under Rule 7 was upheld, and the applicant's petition had become pointless. Order passed on 09 April 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts