Arun Zukalji Phalke vs Jalam Bijaram Walkate Advocate - S. M. Pimpalkar — 117/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG100022042022

Issues

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2340/2022

Filing Date

15-12-2022

Registration No

117/2022

Registration Date

20-12-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 151

Petitioner(s)

Arun Zukalji Phalke

Adv. P. P. Towar

Respondent(s)

Jalam Bijaram Walkate Advocate - S. M. Pimpalkar

Gunderao Bijaram Walkate

Ambabai Madhukarrao Mire

Rekhabai Chirkut Wankhede

Vandana Ekanath Raut

Bhushan Ramesh Dhage

Secretary Gat Grampanchayat, Amboli,

Rajkumar Nathhuji Raut, Sarpanch

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

04-05-2026

Issues

25-03-2026

Issues

23-03-2026

Order

18-03-2026

Order

16-03-2026

Order

Interim Orders

25-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The plaintiff's petition for a temporary injunction was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, that the balance of convenience favored the defendants, and that the plaintiff could not prove irreparable harm requiring urgent court intervention. The court noted disputed factual issues regarding land boundaries, water channel access rights, and agricultural access between neighboring plots that cannot be resolved at the interim relief stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The plaintiff's petition for a temporary injunction was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, that the balance of convenience favored the defendants, and that the plaintiff could not prove irreparable harm requiring urgent court intervention. The court noted disputed factual issues regarding land boundaries, water channel access rights, and agricultural access between neighboring plots that cannot be resolved at the interim relief stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case