State of Maharashtra vs Vikas Hanumantrao Karmore — 74/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG100021842015
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
Filing Number
648/2016
Filing Date
27-07-2016
Registration No
74/2016
Registration Date
27-07-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
FIR Details
FIR Number
121
Police Station
Umrer
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP Umrer
Respondent(s)
Vikas Hanumantrao Karmore
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by accused Shailesh Bhaurao Bele (police naik, age 45) under Section 438 CrPC for anticipatory bail was dismissed. The court found that the accused failed to produce required documents (medical examination form, B-form, FIR copy) and made false statements regarding the investigation. The court concluded there was no basis to grant anticipatory bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by accused Shailesh Bhaurao Bele (police naik, age 45) under Section 438 CrPC for anticipatory bail was dismissed. The court found that the accused failed to produce required documents (medical examination form, B-form, FIR copy) and made false statements regarding the investigation. The court concluded there was no basis to grant anticipatory bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts