Madhav Laxman Helunde vs Suraj Chandrabhan Kshirsagar Advocate - P. M. Khatik — 106/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG100021292022
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2315/2022
Filing Date
24-11-2022
Registration No
106/2022
Registration Date
05-12-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Madhav Laxman Helunde
Adv. L. R. Mandaokar
Respondent(s)
Suraj Chandrabhan Kshirsagar Advocate - P. M. Khatik
Surekha Chandrabhan Kshirsagar
Sanjay Waman Bibekar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a civil suit (RCS No. 106/2022, Madhav v. Suraj) in which the plaintiff's witness testimony and documentary evidence were recorded on 28/07/2025. The court admitted multiple documents into the record, including property ownership receipts, land records, gram panchayat notices regarding illegal construction, and complaint certificates. The defendant was absent during cross-examination, and the case was adjourned with directions for the defendant's counter-arguments to proceed before the concerned judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil suit (RCS No. 106/2022, Madhav v. Suraj) in which the plaintiff's witness testimony and documentary evidence were recorded on 28/07/2025. The court admitted multiple documents into the record, including property ownership receipts, land records, gram panchayat notices regarding illegal construction, and complaint certificates. The defendant was absent during cross-examination, and the case was adjourned with directions for the defendant's counter-arguments to proceed before the concerned judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts