State of Maharashtra Forest Dept. vs Chetan Shankar Nagpure Advocate - S. M. Pimpalkar — 163/2016
Case under Wild Life (protection) Act Section 2(16). Status: Order. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG100017662015
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
292/2016
Filing Date
30-04-2016
Registration No
163/2016
Registration Date
30-04-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
FIR Details
FIR Number
36/25
Police Station
Umrer
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Forest Dept.
Adv. APP Umrer
Respondent(s)
Chetan Shankar Nagpure Advocate - S. M. Pimpalkar
Amol Gangadhar Mohinkar
Adv. M. R. Dhande
Suraj Vilas Mohinkar
Adv. S. M. Pimpalkar
Mahesh Madhukar Mohinkar
Adv. S. M. Pimpalkar
Gurudeo Balkrushna Mohinkar
Adv. M. R. Dhande
Shubham Shankar Mohinkar
Adv. S. M. Pimpalkar
Raju Dudhram Mandhre
Adv. M. R. Dhande
Moreshwar Vithoba Dighore
Adv. M. R. Dhande
Vishnu Dadarao Mohinkar
Adv. S. M. Pimpalkar
Krushna Bapurao Mohinkar
Liladhar Bhaiyyaji Mohinkar
Adv. S. M. Pimpalkar
Gulab Dadarao Mohinkar
Namdeo Fakruji Mandhre
Adv. S. M. Pimpalkar
Vijay Adkuji Mohinkar
Adv. S. M. Pimpalkar
Rajendra Adkuji Mohinkar
Adv. S. M. Pimpalkar
Bandu Adkuji Mohinkar
Adv. S. M. Pimpalkar
Krushna Baliram Mohinkar
Adv. S. M. Pimpalkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Order
Order
Order
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Order | |
| 09-04-2026 | Order | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order | |
| 12-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 29-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal court order from Umred (Maharashtra) dated August 20, 2019, in case No. 163/2016 involving a poaching incident at a wildlife area. The court examined the charge sheet and evidence but found significant deficiencies in the investigation and documentation. The court dismissed the case ("फेर तपास काही नाही" - no further action) due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, inadequate site plans, incomplete witness statements, and improper seizure documentation that failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal court order from Umred (Maharashtra) dated August 20, 2019, in case No. 163/2016 involving a poaching incident at a wildlife area. The court examined the charge sheet and evidence but found significant deficiencies in the investigation and documentation. The court dismissed the case ("फेर तपास काही नाही" - no further action) due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, inadequate site plans, incomplete witness statements, and improper seizure documentation that failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts