Shraddha Arvind Wankhede vs Dilip Doma Wankhede Advocate - B. S. Mane — 70/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Order. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG100017082015

Order

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

117/2016

Filing Date

12-04-2016

Registration No

70/2016

Registration Date

12-04-2016

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer

Judge

1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Shraddha Arvind Wankhede

Adv. R. B. Bhombe

Respondent(s)

Dilip Doma Wankhede Advocate - B. S. Mane

Pradip Doma Wankhede

Adv. L. R. Mandaokar

Jyoti Dhiraj Nitnaware

Adv. P. S. Hunge

Arvind Doma Wankhede

Adv. P. S. Hunge

Omprakash Mulchand Bhaiya

Adv. Adv. Nandanwar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER

23-04-2026

Order

07-04-2026

Order

10-03-2026

Reply/Say

10-02-2026

Reply/Say

13-01-2026

Reply/Say

Interim Orders

06-06-2018
Issues
01-07-2019
Evidence
27-08-2020
Order on Exhibit

Application Rejected The court rejected applicant Pratibha Arvind Wankhede's application to amend the pleading under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC, wherein she sought to claim a 1/3 share in ancestral property. The court held that since the suit property is ancestral and the applicant's husband is alive, she has no independent right over the property during his lifetime, making the proposed amendment unnecessary and unhelpful in determining the real controversy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Application Rejected The court rejected applicant Pratibha Arvind Wankhede's application to amend the pleading under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC, wherein she sought to claim a 1/3 share in ancestral property. The court held that since the suit property is ancestral and the applicant's husband is alive, she has no independent right over the property during his lifetime, making the proposed amendment unnecessary and unhelpful in determining the real controversy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case