State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Bela vs Sunil Vitthalrao Bire Advocate - N. K. Subhedar — 868/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG100016662020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1353/2020
Filing Date
11-12-2020
Registration No
868/2020
Registration Date
11-12-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
218
Police Station
Bela
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Bela
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sunil Vitthalrao Bire Advocate - N. K. Subhedar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgment | |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the defendant Sunil Vithalrao Bire of charges under IPC Sections 294 (obscene language in public) and 506 (criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt due to significant inconsistencies: the complainant filed the FIR one day after the alleged incident without explanation, and witness testimonies contained contradictions regarding the incident's timing and location, creating reasonable doubt about the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the defendant Sunil Vithalrao Bire of charges under IPC Sections 294 (obscene language in public) and 506 (criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt due to significant inconsistencies: the complainant filed the FIR one day after the alleged incident without explanation, and witness testimonies contained contradictions regarding the incident's timing and location, creating reasonable doubt about the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts