Arif S/o. Ismail Negani vs Pushpa Wd/o. Ramesh Chopkar Advocate - Ex parte — 34/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
M.J.Cases - M.J.C
CNR: MHNG100016622020
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
303/2020
Filing Date
10-12-2020
Registration No
34/2020
Registration Date
10-12-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arif S/o. Ismail Negani
Adv. Shahid Raza
Respondent(s)
Pushpa Wd/o. Ramesh Chopkar Advocate - Ex parte
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 15-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MJC No. 34/2020 (Arif vs. Pushpa), the Civil Judge, Umred allowed the applicant's application dated 8th April 2025. The application sought to amend the pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to add paragraph 9-A regarding illegal and unauthorized sale of suit property by defendants during pendency of the underlying specific performance suit (SCS No. 109/2017), despite the defendants' earlier undertaking not to deal with the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MJC No. 34/2020 (Arif vs. Pushpa), the Civil Judge, Umred allowed the applicant's application dated 8th April 2025. The application sought to amend the pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to add paragraph 9-A regarding illegal and unauthorized sale of suit property by defendants during pendency of the underlying specific performance suit (SCS No. 109/2017), despite the defendants' earlier undertaking not to deal with the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts