Sudhir Vitthalrao Wadikar vs Ram Tikaram Chopkar Advocate - A.R.Zade — 71/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG100015262019
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
8080/2019
Filing Date
23-07-2019
Registration No
71/2019
Registration Date
23-07-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhir Vitthalrao Wadikar
Adv. A. B. Pongde
Respondent(s)
Ram Tikaram Chopkar Advocate - A.R.Zade
Kishor Tikaram Chopkar
Dinesh Tikaram Chopkar
Manoj Tikaram Chopkar
Dhananjay Tikaram Chopkar(Legal Heir)
Chetan Ramesh Chopkar
Pushpa Ramesh Chopkar
Pooja Ramesh Chopkar
Jyoti Ramesh Chopkar
Malabai Ajayrao Deshmukh(Legal Heir)
Sheela Wamanrao Durbude
Yashoda Tikaram Chopkar
Lilabai Shripat Vaidya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 06-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 21-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 17-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
In this suit for specific performance of contract, declaration, and perpetual injunction (RCS 71/2019), the court did not grant the ad-interim ex-parte injunction requested by the plaintiff. Instead, the court issued a show cause notice to the defendant explaining why an injunction should not be granted, since the same property was involved in a prior related suit (RCS 142/2016). Emergency process and special bailiff were allowed for service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In this suit for specific performance of contract, declaration, and perpetual injunction (RCS 71/2019), the court did not grant the ad-interim ex-parte injunction requested by the plaintiff. Instead, the court issued a show cause notice to the defendant explaining why an injunction should not be granted, since the same property was involved in a prior related suit (RCS 142/2016). Emergency process and special bailiff were allowed for service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts