State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Umrer vs Keshav Barsu Dighore — 796/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG100015202020
Filing Number
1247/2020
Filing Date
06-11-2020
Registration No
796/2020
Registration Date
06-11-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
619
Police Station
Umrer
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Umrer
Adv. APP M.D.Awariwar
Respondent(s)
Keshav Barsu Dighore
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Disposed
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-01-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 07-11-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 17-09-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 02-06-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the case under Section 258 of the CrPC, acquitting the accused who had remained absent throughout the 5-year-long proceedings involving alleged violations of Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 and IPC Section 188. The court found that further continuation of the summary trial would serve no purpose given the prolonged delay and the accused's continued non-appearance, and therefore ordered closure of the case with the confiscated material to be handed over to the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the case under Section 258 of the CrPC, acquitting the accused who had remained absent throughout the 5-year-long proceedings involving alleged violations of Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 and IPC Section 188. The court found that further continuation of the summary trial would serve no purpose given the prolonged delay and the accused's continued non-appearance, and therefore ordered closure of the case with the confiscated material to be handed over to the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts