State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Umrer vs Nirmala Madhukar Nannaware — 158/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG100015022020
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
Filing Number
1233/2020
Filing Date
03-11-2020
Registration No
158/2020
Registration Date
03-11-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
FIR Details
FIR Number
636
Police Station
Umrer
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Umrer
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Nirmala Madhukar Nannaware
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a criminal trial order from Umred Magistrate Court (Case No. 158/2020) dated 23.04.2026. The court completed examination of prosecution witness no. 05 (Vishnu Krishnaji Raghate, 48 years old, postal worker from Dattardi, Nagpur) regarding postal records and seized documents in a fraud case. The accused's defense counsel (Raghute) cross-examined the witness, who denied several allegations including improper seizure procedures and claimed he only signed documents on senior officers' instructions. The court found the witness testimony acceptable and recorded it as "श्रवणोत्तर स्वीकृत" (examination accepted), with the case proceeding to further trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a criminal trial order from Umred Magistrate Court (Case No. 158/2020) dated 23.04.2026. The court completed examination of prosecution witness no. 05 (Vishnu Krishnaji Raghate, 48 years old, postal worker from Dattardi, Nagpur) regarding postal records and seized documents in a fraud case. The accused's defense counsel (Raghute) cross-examined the witness, who denied several allegations including improper seizure procedures and claimed he only signed documents on senior officers' instructions. The court found the witness testimony acceptable and recorded it as "श्रवणोत्तर स्वीकृत" (examination accepted), with the case proceeding to further trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts