Ashok Ramdas Zade vs Chief Officer — 104/2025

Case under Maharashtra Municipal Council, Nagar Panchayat and Industrial Townships Act,1965 Section 304. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Amended Plaint Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG100014542025

e-Filing Number

06-07-2025

Filing Number

279/2025

Filing Date

09-Jul-2025

Registration No

104/2025

Registration Date

09-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer

Judge

8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Municipal Council, Nagar Panchayat and Industrial Townships Act,1965 Section 304
Code of Civil Procedure Section 80

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Ramdas Zade

    Adv. ZADE SHITAL ASHOK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chief Officer

  2. 2.Panipurvatha And Swacchata Abhiyanta

  3. 3.Sahayak Nagar Rachanakar

  4. 4.Archana Mendhe, Chief Officer

  5. 5.Mayuri Patil

  6. 6.Nikhil Kamdi, Sahayyak Nagar Rachanakar

  7. 7.Chetan Pradip Zalke

  8. 8.Collector Saheb

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint and temporary injunction application to add details about dirty water leakage from an allegedly unauthorized toilet constructed by defendant No.4 on government land. The court found the amendment necessary for just decision-making at the initial stage of the suit and imposed costs of Rs. 300 on defendants 1-3 and Rs. 200 on defendant 4, payable by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  4. 04-May-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  13. 12-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  14. 05-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  15. 15-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  16. 06-Dec-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  17. 29-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  18. 15-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  19. 28-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  20. 13-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  21. 23-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  22. 23-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  23. 20-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  24. 03-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  25. 02-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  26. 07-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  27. 19-Jul-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  28. 10-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer

  29. 09-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 09-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint and temporary injunction application to add details about dirty water leakage from an allegedly unauthorized toilet constructed by defendant No.4 on government land. The court found the amendment necessary for just decision-making at the initial stage of the suit and imposed costs of Rs. 300 on defendants 1-3 and Rs. 200 on defendant 4, payable by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case