Malutai Khushal Waghmare After Marriage Ratnamala Kanhaiyyalal Mehar Befor Marriage vs Western Coal Field Limited Umred Through The General Manager WCL Umred — 97/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 15th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG100014202025
e-Filing Number
25-06-2025
Filing Number
261/2025
Filing Date
26-06-2025
Registration No
97/2025
Registration Date
26-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malutai Khushal Waghmare After Marriage Ratnamala Kanhaiyyalal Mehar Befor Marriage
Adv. K. S. Chichaghare
Respondent(s)
Western Coal Field Limited Umred Through The General Manager WCL Umred
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Reply/Say
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court granted the petition to declare the plaintiff's name change. The court found that Malkutai Kushal Vaghmmare (formerly known as Ratnmala Kanhaiyalal Mehr) is entitled to have her name officially declared, based on documentary evidence including Aadhaar card, PAN card, revenue records (7/12), and a government gazette notification clearly establishing both names belong to the same person. The defendant's opposition was rejected as baseless, and both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The court granted the petition to declare the plaintiff's name change. The court found that Malkutai Kushal Vaghmmare (formerly known as Ratnmala Kanhaiyalal Mehr) is entitled to have her name officially declared, based on documentary evidence including Aadhaar card, PAN card, revenue records (7/12), and a government gazette notification clearly establishing both names belong to the same person. The defendant's opposition was rejected as baseless, and both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts