Malutai Khushal Waghmare After Marriage Ratnamala Kanhaiyyalal Mehar Befor Marriage vs Western Coal Field Limited Umred Through The General Manager WCL Umred — 97/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 15th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG100014202025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-06-2025

Filing Number

261/2025

Filing Date

26-06-2025

Registration No

97/2025

Registration Date

26-06-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer

Judge

1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Malutai Khushal Waghmare After Marriage Ratnamala Kanhaiyyalal Mehar Befor Marriage

Adv. K. S. Chichaghare

Respondent(s)

Western Coal Field Limited Umred Through The General Manager WCL Umred

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER

15-04-2026

Disposed

13-04-2026

Judgment

02-04-2026

Arguments

17-03-2026

Reply/Say

10-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The court granted the petition to declare the plaintiff's name change. The court found that Malkutai Kushal Vaghmmare (formerly known as Ratnmala Kanhaiyalal Mehr) is entitled to have her name officially declared, based on documentary evidence including Aadhaar card, PAN card, revenue records (7/12), and a government gazette notification clearly establishing both names belong to the same person. The defendant's opposition was rejected as baseless, and both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

20-01-2026
Evidence
20-01-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court granted the petition to declare the plaintiff's name change. The court found that Malkutai Kushal Vaghmmare (formerly known as Ratnmala Kanhaiyalal Mehr) is entitled to have her name officially declared, based on documentary evidence including Aadhaar card, PAN card, revenue records (7/12), and a government gazette notification clearly establishing both names belong to the same person. The defendant's opposition was rejected as baseless, and both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case