Chandrashekhar Ramdas Bawankule vs Abdul Salam Qureshi Sk. Kasam Qureshi Advocate - S. K. Likhite — 144/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG100012852017
Next Hearing
21st July 2026
Filing Number
1930/2017
Filing Date
26-02-2015
Registration No
144/2017
Registration Date
26-02-2010
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrashekhar Ramdas Bawankule
Adv. B.S.Mane
Respondent(s)
Abdul Salam Qureshi Sk. Kasam Qureshi Advocate - S. K. Likhite
Bharati Jitendra Giradkar
Adv. A. B. Pongde
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 02-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Civil Case No. 144/2017 (Chandrasekhar v. Abdul Salam) from Umred Court involving a property transaction dispute. The court examination records witness testimony regarding a property agreement involving Rs. 13,75,000, with partial payment made via cheque that bounced. The witness cross-examination and court findings indicate issues with contract documentation, witness credibility, and disputed terms of the agreement. The case appears to address contractual obligations and potential fraud allegations related to the property transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Civil Case No. 144/2017 (Chandrasekhar v. Abdul Salam) from Umred Court involving a property transaction dispute. The court examination records witness testimony regarding a property agreement involving Rs. 13,75,000, with partial payment made via cheque that bounced. The witness cross-examination and court findings indicate issues with contract documentation, witness credibility, and disputed terms of the agreement. The case appears to address contractual obligations and potential fraud allegations related to the property transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts