Lata Shrihari Balbudhe vs Pradip Vasantrao Tiwase — 65/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 27th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG100012202022
Filing Number
2096/2022
Filing Date
18-07-2022
Registration No
65/2022
Registration Date
18-07-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lata Shrihari Balbudhe
Adv. L. R. Mandaokar
Manisha Rajkumar Kohpare
Adv. L. R. Mandaokar
Respondent(s)
Pradip Vasantrao Tiwase
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration and partition of property. The judge found that the deceased mother (Kamalabai) validly executed a registered will on 27.10.2020 bequeathing the entire property to the defendant (her son), and plaintiffs failed to prove the will was forged or executed without her knowledge. Under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, the mother had absolute rights to dispose of her self-acquired property as she wished. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration and partition of property. The judge found that the deceased mother (Kamalabai) validly executed a registered will on 27.10.2020 bequeathing the entire property to the defendant (her son), and plaintiffs failed to prove the will was forged or executed without her knowledge. Under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, the mother had absolute rights to dispose of her self-acquired property as she wished. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts