Hemraj Mahadeorao Kamble vs Chindhu Govinda Kolhe Advocate - Ex party — 193/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG100012072017
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
1855/2017
Filing Date
20-09-2016
Registration No
193/2017
Registration Date
03-10-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hemraj Mahadeorao Kamble
Adv. P. M. Shrawane
Respondent(s)
Chindhu Govinda Kolhe Advocate - Ex party
Yashoda Govinda Kolhe
Adv. Ex party
Pawan Babarao Raut
Adv. P. K. Bezalwar
The Sub Registrar, Umred, Dist. Nagpur
Adv. P. B. Bhoyar
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-12-2025 | Arguments |
| 02-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In R.C.S. No. 193/2017 (Hemraj Vs. Chindu & Oth), the Civil Court at Umred recorded the examination-in-chief of witness Hemraj Mahadevrao Kambale on 26.02.2024. The witness affirmed his affidavit (Exhibit 22) and authenticated documentary evidence including the original sale deed dated 28.03.2008 (Exhibit 25), 7/12 extract of the disputed agricultural land (Exhibit 26), and Form 8-A certified copy (Exhibit 27). Cross-examination was adjourned as the respondent and their counsel were absent; the court granted one opportunity for cross-examination in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In R.C.S. No. 193/2017 (Hemraj Vs. Chindu & Oth), the Civil Court at Umred recorded the examination-in-chief of witness Hemraj Mahadevrao Kambale on 26.02.2024. The witness affirmed his affidavit (Exhibit 22) and authenticated documentary evidence including the original sale deed dated 28.03.2008 (Exhibit 25), 7/12 extract of the disputed agricultural land (Exhibit 26), and Form 8-A certified copy (Exhibit 27). Cross-examination was adjourned as the respondent and their counsel were absent; the court granted one opportunity for cross-examination in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts