State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Bela vs Ramesh Shankar Verma Advocate - P. Y. Sukhdeve — 551/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 28th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG100011252022
Next Hearing
28th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
800/2022
Filing Date
29-06-2022
Registration No
551/2022
Registration Date
29-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
FIR Details
FIR Number
96
Police Station
Bela
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Bela
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Shankar Verma Advocate - P. Y. Sukhdeve
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: FIR 551/2022, State v. Ramesh (Umred Court) Outcome: The petition is fully allowed and charges are dismissed. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case against the accused regarding the motor vehicle accident that resulted in the death of the complainant's son on 18/03/2022. Key Finding: The witness testimony was contradictory and unreliable; the accused denied knowledge of which vehicle caused the accident and provided a valid defense. The court determined insufficient evidence to proceed with prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: FIR 551/2022, State v. Ramesh (Umred Court) Outcome: The petition is fully allowed and charges are dismissed. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case against the accused regarding the motor vehicle accident that resulted in the death of the complainant's son on 18/03/2022. Key Finding: The witness testimony was contradictory and unreliable; the accused denied knowledge of which vehicle caused the accident and provided a valid defense. The court determined insufficient evidence to proceed with prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts