Dhanraj Madhaorao Fukat vs State of Maharashtra through Collector, Nagpur Advocate - Ex — 154/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG100009972017
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
Filing Number
1494/2017
Filing Date
05-02-2014
Registration No
154/2017
Registration Date
20-02-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhanraj Madhaorao Fukat
Adv. L.R. Mandaokar
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through Collector, Nagpur Advocate - Ex
Tahsildar, Kuhi
Adv. D. D. Gadewar
Revenue Inspector, Nevri
Adv. D. D. Gadewar
Talathi, Nevari
Adv. D. D. Gadewar
Sheshrao S/o Manik Dhanare
Adv. Ex Party
Kailas @ Kola S/o Manik Dhanare
Adv. Ex Party
Pramila W/o Ramdas Wilayatkar Through her L.R.'s Subhash Ramdas Vilayatkar
Adv. N. M. Gundare
Mangala Govindrao Nanotkar
Adv. N. M. Gundare
Ranjana Mahakalkar
Adv. N. M. Gundare
Ramdas S/o Mahadeo Wilayatkar Through L.R.'s Narendra Ramdas Wilayatkar
Adv. N. M. Gundare
Ravindra Ramdas Vilayatkar
Adv. N. M. Gundare
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 10-03-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 27-01-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 09-12-2025 | Amended Plaint |
| 28-10-2025 | Amended Plaint |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the applications for condonation of delay (333 days) in setting aside abatement and bringing legal representatives (LRs) on record. The plaintiff sought to add the five legal heirs of deceased defendant no.7 (Pramila Ramdas Wilayatkar) to the case, contending the delay was not deliberate. The court found sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, as the matter involves immovable property rights and the plaintiff's inability to identify the legal heirs timely. Applications were granted subject to payment of Rs. 300 costs to DLSA Nagpur, with the plaintiff directed to amend and supply the revised plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the applications for condonation of delay (333 days) in setting aside abatement and bringing legal representatives (LRs) on record. The plaintiff sought to add the five legal heirs of deceased defendant no.7 (Pramila Ramdas Wilayatkar) to the case, contending the delay was not deliberate. The court found sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, as the matter involves immovable property rights and the plaintiff's inability to identify the legal heirs timely. Applications were granted subject to payment of Rs. 300 costs to DLSA Nagpur, with the plaintiff directed to amend and supply the revised plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts