Prabhakar Jagannath Dhenge through Prabja Prabhakar Dhenge vs Shriram Gopalrao Nikhade Expired through Usha Shriram Nikhade Advocate - G. R. Hunge — 144/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG100009912017
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
1489/2017
Filing Date
30-06-2011
Registration No
144/2017
Registration Date
07-07-2011
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhakar Jagannath Dhenge through Prabja Prabhakar Dhenge
Adv. A. B. Pongde
Nilesh s/o Prabhakar Dhenge
Shaisesh s/o Prabhakar Dhenge
Mahesh s/o Prabhakar Dhenge
Namrata d/o. Swapnil Palandurkar
Respondent(s)
Shriram Gopalrao Nikhade Expired through Usha Shriram Nikhade Advocate - G. R. Hunge
Vilas Gopalrao Nikhade
Adv. G. R. Hunge
State of Maharashtra, Mumbai Through Collector, Nagpur
Adv. P. R. Bhure
Deputy Director Of Land Records, Nagpur
Adv. P. R. Bhure
Ashish Shriram Nikhade
Rashi Shriram Nikhade
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
The court dismissed the appeal against the plaintiff's right to the land. The court found that the plaintiff's survey and possession from 1993 were valid, and there were no boundary violations or encroachments on the defendant's property. The court rejected the defendant's counter-arguments regarding land area discrepancies and confirmed the plaintiff's title to the disputed land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the appeal against the plaintiff's right to the land. The court found that the plaintiff's survey and possession from 1993 were valid, and there were no boundary violations or encroachments on the defendant's property. The court rejected the defendant's counter-arguments regarding land area discrepancies and confirmed the plaintiff's title to the disputed land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts