Manohar Narayan Bande and Two (Died) through Its LR,s. Suhas Manohar Bande vs Collector Through Spl. L.A.O. MIW, Nagpur Advocate - A.G.Wandile — 200169/2003
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHNG100007822003
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
200169/2003
Filing Date
17-10-2003
Registration No
200169/2003
Registration Date
17-10-2003
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manohar Narayan Bande and Two (Died) through Its LR,s. Suhas Manohar Bande
Adv. A.R. Uttarwar
Sudhir Manohar Bande
Adv. Ajay R. Uttarwar
Pramila Manohar Bande
Adv. Ajay R. Uttarwar
Sushama Anil Pathak
Adv. Ajay R. Uttarwar
Snigedha Subodh Yeotikar
Adv. Ajay R. Uttarwar
Prashant Ashwini Kumar Bande
Adv. Ajay R. Uttarwar
Bhushan Ashwinikumar Bande
Adv. Ajay R. Uttarwar
Vijay Ashwinikumar Bande
Adv. Ajay R. Uttarwar
Anand Vasant Bobde
Adv. Ajay R. Uttarwar
Milind Vasant Bobde
Adv. Ajay R. Uttarwar
Santosh Vasant Bobde
Adv. Ajay R. Uttarwar
Respondent(s)
Collector Through Spl. L.A.O. MIW, Nagpur Advocate - A.G.Wandile
The Executive Engineer,Nagpur
Adv. A.G.Wandile
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court heard both sides where the applicant sought amendment regarding address. The proposed amendment appears formal in nature and does not change the core issue. The court found that just 7 days of adjudication on merits is necessary. Considering the reasons, facts alleged, nature of the matter, and provisions of O.6 R.17 CPC and Section 151 CPC, the prayer for amendment is allowed in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court heard both sides where the applicant sought amendment regarding address. The proposed amendment appears formal in nature and does not change the core issue. The court found that just 7 days of adjudication on merits is necessary. Considering the reasons, facts alleged, nature of the matter, and provisions of O.6 R.17 CPC and Section 151 CPC, the prayer for amendment is allowed in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts