Shri. Rajendra Girdhari Amru vs Prabhakar Govindrao Wandile Advocate - R.B.Bhombe — 28/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG100007762022
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2012/2022
Filing Date
27-04-2022
Registration No
28/2022
Registration Date
27-04-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Rajendra Girdhari Amru
Adv. P. H. Raghute
Respondent(s)
Prabhakar Govindrao Wandile Advocate - R.B.Bhombe
Meghmala Anil Balpande
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Compliance
Order
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Compliance | |
| 28-04-2026 | Order | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-12-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC, permitting him to add pleadings and a prayer regarding the sale deed executed by Defendant No.1 in favor of Defendant No.2. However, the amendment does not relate back to the original plaint date and is treated as brought on record on 08.01.2025. The court found the amendment necessary since the suit concerns specific performance of a sale agreement, and no prejudice would result to defendants as the case has not reached the evidence stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC, permitting him to add pleadings and a prayer regarding the sale deed executed by Defendant No.1 in favor of Defendant No.2. However, the amendment does not relate back to the original plaint date and is treated as brought on record on 08.01.2025. The court found the amendment necessary since the suit concerns specific performance of a sale agreement, and no prejudice would result to defendants as the case has not reached the evidence stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts