State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Bela vs Sanjay Wamanrao Lambat — 336/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG100006942024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

474/2024

Filing Date

24-05-2024

Registration No

336/2024

Registration Date

24-05-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

Decision Date

04th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

Bela

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Bela

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sanjay Wamanrao Lambat

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

04-04-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Arguments

18-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

04-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

04-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted accused Sanjay Vamnarao Lambat of charges under the Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 12 bottles of illicit liquor were in his possession. The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including reliance on a single witness whose testimony was unreliable, absence of independent corroborating witnesses, and lack of proper chemical examination reports, making it impossible to establish that the seized material was actually illicit liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

11-07-2025
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted accused Sanjay Vamnarao Lambat of charges under the Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 12 bottles of illicit liquor were in his possession. The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including reliance on a single witness whose testimony was unreliable, absence of independent corroborating witnesses, and lack of proper chemical examination reports, making it impossible to establish that the seized material was actually illicit liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case