State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Bela vs Sanjay Wamanrao Lambat — 336/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG100006942024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
474/2024
Filing Date
24-05-2024
Registration No
336/2024
Registration Date
24-05-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
84
Police Station
Bela
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. Bela
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Wamanrao Lambat
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted accused Sanjay Vamnarao Lambat of charges under the Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 12 bottles of illicit liquor were in his possession. The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including reliance on a single witness whose testimony was unreliable, absence of independent corroborating witnesses, and lack of proper chemical examination reports, making it impossible to establish that the seized material was actually illicit liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted accused Sanjay Vamnarao Lambat of charges under the Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 12 bottles of illicit liquor were in his possession. The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including reliance on a single witness whose testimony was unreliable, absence of independent corroborating witnesses, and lack of proper chemical examination reports, making it impossible to establish that the seized material was actually illicit liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts