Raju Domaji Dangale vs Raju Maroti Thakre Advocate - L.R.Mandaokar — 48/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG100006122024
e-Filing Number
02-05-2024
Filing Number
182/2024
Filing Date
02-May-2024
Registration No
48/2024
Registration Date
03-May-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raju Domaji Dangale
Adv. ZADE ASHOK RAMDAS
-
2.Mirabai Pandit Mahajan Through LRs Jayant Pandit Mahajan
-
3.Vaishali Vinayak Choudhari
-
4.Rupali Thakre
-
5.Dipali Pal
-
6.Sonali Pandit Mahajan (Sonali Bhaskar Khurpadi)
Adv. ZADE ASHOK RAMDAS
-
7.Monali Pandit Mahajan (Monali Vishwadip Hargude)
-
8.Pranali Pandit Mahajan
-
9.Chindhabai Vinayak Dahane
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raju Maroti Thakre Advocate - L.R.Mandaokar
-
2.Shantabai Bapu Urkude
-
3.Sunita Mahadeo Narule
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
-
4.Chandrakala Chandrabhan Bhoyar
-
5.Vanita Ramrao Bhujade
Adv. S.G.Khanorkar
-
6.Kantabai Arjun Narule
-
7.Kavita Suresh Bangde
Adv. S.G.Khanorkar
-
8.Anusayabai Shyamrao Dhobi
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
-
9.Hariom Shankarrao Telrandhe
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
-
10.Chandrabhansingh Sureshsingh Thakur
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
-
11.Ashish Ashok Wadhai
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
-
12.Pranita Mangesh Wadhai
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
-
13.Tahsildar
-
14.Talathi
-
15.Mandal Adhikari
-
16.Sub Registrar Class 1
Case History
-
14-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
10-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
27-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
16-Dec-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
18-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 48/2024 (Raju vs. Raju), the Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application to implead proposed defendants Nos. 17 to 19 as party defendants. The court found them to be necessary parties since they had purchased portions of the suit property during the pendency of the suit, and the plaintiffs were asserting pre-emption rights and challenging registered sale-deeds. The application was accordingly allowed on 18 November 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Nov-2025
Compliance
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
06-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
06-Oct-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
26-Aug-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
29-Jul-2025
Public Notice/Proclamation
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
21-Jun-2025
Public Notice/Proclamation
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
03-May-2025
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
05-Apr-2025
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
24-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
15-Feb-2025
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
21-Jan-2025
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
18-Dec-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
18-Dec-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
16-Nov-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
08-Oct-2024
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
04-Sep-2024
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
26-Aug-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
26-Aug-2024
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
13-Aug-2024
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
22-Jul-2024
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
06-Jul-2024
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
24-Jun-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Jun-2024
Order
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
10-Jun-2024
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
-
08-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2024
Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 48/2024 (Raju vs. Raju), the Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application to implead proposed defendants Nos. 17 to 19 as party defendants. The court found them to be necessary parties since they had purchased portions of the suit property during the pendency of the suit, and the plaintiffs were asserting pre-emption rights and challenging registered sale-deeds. The application was accordingly allowed on 18 November 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts