Raju Domaji Dangale vs Raju Maroti Thakre Advocate - L.R.Mandaokar — 48/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG100006122024
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
e-Filing Number
02-05-2024
Filing Number
182/2024
Filing Date
02-05-2024
Registration No
48/2024
Registration Date
03-05-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raju Domaji Dangale
Adv. ZADE ASHOK RAMDAS
Mirabai Pandit Mahajan Through LRs Jayant Pandit Mahajan
Vaishali Vinayak Choudhari
Rupali Thakre
Dipali Pal
Sonali Pandit Mahajan (Sonali Bhaskar Khurpadi)
Adv. ZADE ASHOK RAMDAS
Monali Pandit Mahajan (Monali Vishwadip Hargude)
Pranali Pandit Mahajan
Chindhabai Vinayak Dahane
Respondent(s)
Raju Maroti Thakre Advocate - L.R.Mandaokar
Shantabai Bapu Urkude
Sunita Mahadeo Narule
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
Chandrakala Chandrabhan Bhoyar
Vanita Ramrao Bhujade
Adv. S.G.Khanorkar
Kantabai Arjun Narule
Kavita Suresh Bangde
Adv. S.G.Khanorkar
Anusayabai Shyamrao Dhobi
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
Hariom Shankarrao Telrandhe
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
Chandrabhansingh Sureshsingh Thakur
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
Ashish Ashok Wadhai
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
Pranita Mangesh Wadhai
Adv. L.R.Mandaokar
Tahsildar
Talathi
Mandal Adhikari
Sub Registrar Class 1
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Amended Plaint
Compliance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 27-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 16-12-2025 | Amended Plaint | |
| 18-11-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 48/2024 (Raju vs. Raju), the Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application to implead proposed defendants Nos. 17 to 19 as party defendants. The court found them to be necessary parties since they had purchased portions of the suit property during the pendency of the suit, and the plaintiffs were asserting pre-emption rights and challenging registered sale-deeds. The application was accordingly allowed on 18 November 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 48/2024 (Raju vs. Raju), the Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application to implead proposed defendants Nos. 17 to 19 as party defendants. The court found them to be necessary parties since they had purchased portions of the suit property during the pendency of the suit, and the plaintiffs were asserting pre-emption rights and challenging registered sale-deeds. The application was accordingly allowed on 18 November 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts