State of Maharashtra thr. Excise Department vs Purushottam Rajaram Gedam — 279/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG100005702023
Filing Number
390/2023
Filing Date
15-Apr-2023
Registration No
279/2023
Registration Date
17-Apr-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
200
Police Station
Umrer
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra thr. Excise Department
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Purushottam Rajaram Gedam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court acquitted accused Purushottam Rajaram Gedam of charges under the Maharashtra Arms Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that 15 country-made firearms were found in his possession. The court noted that only one witness was examined and critical evidence—including the site inspection panchnama, chemical analysis report, and the person who submitted the seized weapons to the laboratory—was not properly substantiated, making it impossible to definitively prove the recovered items were firearms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
10-Apr-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
09-Apr-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
14-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
14-Nov-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
05-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
16-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
08-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
-
23-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt.civil Judge Jr. Dvn. J.m.f.c.umrer
-
05-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt.civil Judge Jr. Dvn. J.m.f.c.umrer
-
13-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt.civil Judge Jr. Dvn. J.m.f.c.umrer
-
27-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt.civil Judge Jr. Dvn. J.m.f.c.umrer
-
26-Dec-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt.civil Judge Jr. Dvn. J.m.f.c.umrer
-
04-Oct-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt.civil Judge Jr. Dvn. J.m.f.c.umrer
-
05-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt.civil Judge Jr. Dvn. J.m.f.c.umrer
-
17-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 279/2023
Summary The court acquitted accused Purushottam Rajaram Gedam of charges under the Maharashtra Arms Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that 15 country-made firearms were found in his possession. The court noted that only one witness was examined and critical evidence—including the site inspection panchnama, chemical analysis report, and the person who submitted the seized weapons to the laboratory—was not properly substantiated, making it impossible to definitively prove the recovered items were firearms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts