Ganesh Tarachand Selokar vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Umred. — 31/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG100004462026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

350/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

Police Station

Umrer

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Ganesh Tarachand Selokar

Adv. Lichade Jitesh Pandurang

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Umred.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

16-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Reply/Say

09-03-2026

Reply/Say

06-03-2026

Reply/Say

04-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the application and released the seized Tata Motors tipper vehicle (Registration No. MH-36-AB-3749) to applicant Ganesh Tarachand Selokar on an indemnity bond of Rs. 30 lakhs, finding that prolonged detention would deteriorate the vehicle's utility value. The court reasoned that while the vehicle was seized under BNS Section 303(2) for criminal proceedings, any separate proceedings under the Mines and Minerals Regulation (MLR) Code would be independent actions by revenue authorities, and detention served no purpose pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application and released the seized Tata Motors tipper vehicle (Registration No. MH-36-AB-3749) to applicant Ganesh Tarachand Selokar on an indemnity bond of Rs. 30 lakhs, finding that prolonged detention would deteriorate the vehicle's utility value. The court reasoned that while the vehicle was seized under BNS Section 303(2) for criminal proceedings, any separate proceedings under the Mines and Minerals Regulation (MLR) Code would be independent actions by revenue authorities, and detention served no purpose pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case