State Of Maharashtra P. S. Khaparkheda vs Jagdish Prasad Shamaprit Prasad — 3032/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG090047052025

e-Filing Number

24-12-2025

Filing Number

4057/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

3032/2025

Registration Date

26-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

741

Police Station

KHAPARKHEDA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State Of Maharashtra P. S. Khaparkheda

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Jagdish Prasad Shamaprit Prasad

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: 3032/2025 The Lok Adalat (People's Court) at Saner convicted defendant Jagdish Prasad under IPC Section 285 for a minor offense involving rash or negligent conduct. The defendant voluntarily pleaded guilty and paid the imposed fine of ₹500, which satisfied the court's requirements. Decision: The court sentenced the defendant to pay a fine of ₹500 under IPC Sections 276 and 285, and closed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
26-Dec-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
24-Dec-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 3032/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 3032/2025 The Lok Adalat (People's Court) at Saner convicted defendant Jagdish Prasad under IPC Section 285 for a minor offense involving rash or negligent conduct. The defendant voluntarily pleaded guilty and paid the imposed fine of ₹500, which satisfied the court's requirements. Decision: The court sentenced the defendant to pay a fine of ₹500 under IPC Sections 276 and 285, and closed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.