Dnyaneshwar Devravji Bonsule vs Nitin Yadavrav Aawari Advocate - V. K. Kautkar — 129/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CODEOFCIVILPROCEDURE. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG090046662025
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
e-Filing Number
20-12-2025
Filing Number
646/2025
Filing Date
23-12-2025
Registration No
129/2025
Registration Date
23-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner
Judge
12-Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dnyaneshwar Devravji Bonsule
Adv. TAJNE HEMANTKUMAR ISHWARJI
Respondent(s)
Nitin Yadavrav Aawari Advocate - V. K. Kautkar
Sah Mamlatdar and Naib Tehsildar Kalmeshwar
Adv. J. I. Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 07-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 03-02-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 21-01-2026 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
Order on Exhibit
Order on Exhibit
Summary: This is a civil court order from CJSD Saoner dated 03-02-2026 (Exhibit 17) in a suit involving plaintiff Nitilal Yadavrao Aavari versus defendant Bonsule. The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments regarding defamation and property rights claims, finding them unsubstantiated under civil procedure and substantive law. The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition, holding that the defendant had not violated the plaintiff's legal rights and directing the plaintiff to bear the costs of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a civil court order from CJSD Saoner dated 03-02-2026 (Exhibit 17) in a suit involving plaintiff Nitilal Yadavrao Aavari versus defendant Bonsule. The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments regarding defamation and property rights claims, finding them unsubstantiated under civil procedure and substantive law. The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition, holding that the defendant had not violated the plaintiff's legal rights and directing the plaintiff to bear the costs of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts